🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler after Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he invoked the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and powerful strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is often overmatched. The past few seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and held the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of American men winning major titles when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of agony. When he finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly seem like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {